Isaac Scientific Publishing

Journal of Advances in Education Research

Avoiding Political Pitfalls Associated with School Mathematics Reforms

Download PDF (297.5 KB) PP. 1 - 12 Pub. Date: November 8, 2016

DOI: 10.22606/jaer.2016.11001

Author(s)

  • Patty Anne Wagner*
    Department of Mathematics, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, United States

Abstract

Over the course of United States history, there have been numerous attempts to reform school mathematics in order to increase student achievement. Although the methods of reform have varied, a common theme has emerged: the reform encounters a political backlash that forces a retreat into traditional instructional materials and methods. Education leaders, including mathematics education coaches and specialists, are tasked with fostering school mathematics reforms and are unavoidably at the forefront of this ongoing political struggle. Unfortunately, the research community has offered little insight into how education leaders can effectively engage the critics of reforms. This research study examined the beliefs and motivations of the critics of mathematics education reforms and offers suggestions for how education leaders can avoid potential political pitfalls while effectively engaging with these critics.

Keywords

Education leadership, math wars, mathematics education, mathematics education reforms.

References

[1] Adams, M. (2009, May 18). “The nature of conservatism.” Available: http://townhall.com/columnists/mikeadams/2009/05/18/the_nature_of_conservatism/page/full

[2] Adler, M. J. (1940). “God and the professors: Our education cannot support democracy.” Vital speeches of the day, vol 7, no. 4, pp. 98–103.

[3] Battista, M. T. (1999). “The mathematical miseducation of America’s youth.” Phi delta kappan, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 424–433.

[4] Bagley, W. C. (1938). “An essentialist’s platform for the advancement of American education.” Educational administration and supervision, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 241–256.

[5] Beck, G. (2013, April 8). “What is transformational education?” [Video file]. Available: http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/04/08/watch-what-is-transformational-education/.

[6] Becker, J. P. and Jacob, B. (2000). “The politics of California school mathematics: The anti-reform of 1997–99.”Phi delta kappan, vol. 81, pp. 529–537.

[7] Bubba, P. (2014, March 18). “Common Core math explained by math teacher” [video file]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYhdh4SmZvI

[8] Champion News Online. (2013, July 18). “Common Core: Wrong answers are just fine” [video file]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCfg1gzQ-UI

[9] Chapman, M. J. (2013). “Arbitrary math. Operation Jericho.” Available: http://americanheritageresearch.com

[10] Conservapedia. (2013). “Conservative values.” Available: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_values

[11] Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990). “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.”Qualitative sociology, vol. 13 no. 1, pp. 3–21.

[12] Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage. Dewey, J. (1937a). “President Hutchins’ proposals to remake higher education.” Social frontier, vol. 3, pp. 103–104.

[13] Dewey, J. (1937b). “The higher learning in America.” Social frontier, vol. 3, pp. 137–139.

[14] Dewey, J. (1941/1988). “Lessons from the war—in philosophy. Address at Cooper Union, New York, December 7, 1941.” In J. A. Boydston (Ed.) John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953. Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 313–334.

[15] Downing, K. D. (2001). “Conservatism vs. liberalism: Does philosophy really matter?” Available: http://www.conservatismvsliberalism.net/

[16] Garelick, B. (2005). “An a-maze-ing approach to math.” Education Next, 5(2). Available: http://educationnext.org/anamazeingapproachtomath/.

[17] Gutstein, E. (2006). “Driving while black or brown: A math project about racial profiling.” In E. Gutstein and B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Rethinking Schools. pp.16–18.Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (2001). “The roots of the education wars.” In T. Loveless (Ed.), The great curriculum debate: How should we teach reading and math? Brookings Institution.

[18] Garelick, B. (2013, July 9). Do the ‘math wars’ really exist? Education News. Retrieved from http://www.educationnews.org/k-12-schools/do-the-math-wars-really-exist/

[19] Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1997). “Why traditional education is progressive.” The American Enterprise. 42–45. Retrieved from https://www.heartland.org/publications-resources/publications/why-traditional-education-is-progressive

[20] Hutchins, R. M. (1936). “General education.” In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), The higher learning in America. Yale University Press. pp. 59–87

[21] Jessica, M. J. (2014, March 26). “Teaching math in bizarro world” [video file]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHxThdCWWxw

[22] Kandel, I. L. (1938). “As essentialists would have it.” Parents magazine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 66–67.

[23] Kohn, A. (1998). “Only for my kid: How privileged parent undermine school reform.” Phi delta kappan, vol. 79, pp. 569–577.

[24] Kane, I. M. [imkane2012]. (2014, September 8). “Common Core math makes simple arithmetic as complex as calculus” [video file]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djmtDxTF4ZI

[25] Laser, M. (2010, November 29). “Conservatives vs. liberals: Before you indoctrinate your kids, read this.” The Christian Science Monitor. Available: http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/1129/Conservatives-vs.-liberals-Before-youindoctrinate-your-kids-read-this

[26] Lehman College, Multimedia Center. (2011). “Math education reform: Does it add up?” [Video webcast]. Available: http://www.nychold.com

[27] Leong, Y. K. (2013). “Mathematics K–12: Crisis in education.” Asia Pacific mathematics newsletter, vol. 3, no.1, pp. 31–40.

[28] Limbaugh, R. (2007, April 2). “What the left’s anti-bully movement really means.” Available: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2007/04/02/what_the_left_s_anti_bully_movement_really_means

[29] Limbaugh, R. (2012, February 15). “Educator: Parents don’t know best.” Available: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/02/15/educator_parents_don_t_know_best

[30] Loveless, T. (Ed). (2001). “Introduction.” In The great curriculum debate: How should we teach reading and math? Brookings Institution.

[31] Loveless, T. (2004). “Trends in math achievement: The importance of basic skills.” Available: http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mathscience/loveless.html

[32] Meyer, D. (2010). “Dan Meyer: Math class needs a makeover.” Available: https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_meyer_math_curriculum_makeover?language=en

[33] Milgram, J. (n.d.). “Pattern recognition problems in K–12.” Available: http://math.stanford.edu/~milgram/education-index.html

[34] Morganstern, M. (2013). “4x3=11? Did school official really say it doesn’t matter if students get simple math wrong under Common Core?” Available: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/19/rumor-check-4-x-3-11- did-school-official-really-say-it-doesnt-matter-if-students-get-simple-math-wrong-under-common-core/

[35] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Author.

[36] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.

[37] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions. Author.

[38] National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards Mathematics. Available: http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf

[39] Norton, O. (2011, June 22). “Report suggests improvements to ASD math program” [Web log post]. Available: http://blog.oaknorton.com/report-suggests-improvements-to-asd-math-program-alarming/

[40] NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10, 2012.

[41] O’Brien, T. C. (1999). “Parrot math.” Phi delta kappan, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 434–438.

[42] Pajares, M. F. (1992). “Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.” Review of educational research, vol. 62, pp. 307–332.

[43] Pappas, N. (2003). “Don’t just stand there. Do something! (about school mathematics).” Available: http://www.nychold.com/oped-pappas-0309.pdf

[44] Philipp, R. A. (2007). “Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect.” In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Information Age. pp. 257–315

[45] Pierson, P. (1993). “When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change.” World politics, vol. 45,pp. 595–628.

[46] Quirk, B. (2002). “A summary view of NCEE math.” Available: http://web.archive.org/web/20130430123519/http://wgquirk.com/NCEE.html

[47] Raimi, R. A. (2004). “Notes for talk at National Association of Scholars meeting in NYC May 22, 2004: How did it ever come to this?” Available: http://www.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/rarm/nas_talk.html

[48] Reys, R. E. (2001). “Curricular controversy in the math wars: A battle without winners.” Phi delta kappan, vol.83, no. 3, pp. 255–258.

[49] Romberg, T. A. and Kaput, J. J. (1999). “Mathematics worth understanding.” In E. Fennema and T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 3–17.

[50] Schoen, H. L., Fey, J. T., Hirsch, C. R., and Coxford, A. (1999). “Issues and options in the math wars.” Phidelta kappan, vol. 80, pp. 444–453.

[51] Saunders, D. J. (2008). “Return of the math wars.” Available: http://www.creators.com/opinion/debrasaunders/return-of-the-math-wars.html

[52] Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). “The math wars.” Educational policy, vol. 18, pp. 253–286.

[53] Stotsky, S. (2009, November 13). “Who need mathematicians for math, anyway?” Available: http://www.cityjournal.org/2009/eon1113ss.html

[54] Talbert, J. E. (2002). “Professionalism and politics in high school teaching reform.” Journal of educational change, vol. 3, pp. 339–363.

[55] Wagner, P. A. (2014). “The math wars: Communities of meaning within the critics of school mathematics reform” (Doctoral dissertation). Available: UGA electronic theses and dissertations.

[56] Weinberger, D. (2011). “Liberals, conservatives, and human nature.” Available: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/09/liberals-conservatives-and-human-nature/

[57] Wu, H. (1999). “The joy of lecturing—with a critique of the romantic tradition of education writing.” In S.Krantz (Ed.), How to teach mathematics (pp. 261–271). American Mathematical Society.

[58] Wu, H. (2011). “The mis-education of mathematics teachers.” Notices of the AMS, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 372–383.

[59] Yannow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Sage.