Isaac Scientific Publishing

Journal of Advances in Education Research

A Curriculum Unit for Promoting Complex System Thinking: The Case of Combined System Dynamics and Agent Based Models for Population Growth

Download PDF (585.9 KB) PP. 39 - 60 Pub. Date: May 18, 2017

DOI: 10.22606/jaer.2017.22001

Author(s)

  • Billie Eilam*
    Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Dorit Reisfeld
    Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Israel

Abstract

Calls for school curricula to increase students’ exposure to complex systems are clearly warranted, given the topic’s learnability and the increasing prevalence of such systems. This study deepens our understanding of 16 ninth graders’ system thinking by identifying some cognitive aspects involved in the acquisition process while studying specially designed simulation-based curriculum for a full semester. Students manipulated two simulation-types: (a) providing a top-down view of the system behavior – based on the system dynamics model, and (b) providing a bottom-up view of the same system – based on the agent-based model. Contrasting these simulation outputs scaffold students’ ability to relate the system macro and micro levels. We focused on complex system conceptual knowledge (dynamic equilibrium) and diverse system thinking modes (stochastic or dynamic thinking) by examining students’ written and computerized products and pre-posttests results. A significant improvement in most students’ system thinking abilities has been found. Implications for school science instruction are discussed.

Keywords

Complex systems; system thinking; ecology; agent-based and system dynamics models; cognitive aspects; junior-high school

References

[1] ActiveState (2007). Free Tcl open source binary language. Available: http://www.activestate.com/Products/activetcl/.

[2] M. Alfonseca, R. M.Carro, J. de Lara and E. Pudildo (1998). “Education in ecology at the internet with an object-oriented simulation language”. In K. Juslin (Ed.), Proceeding of the EUROSIM'98 Simulation Congress at Espoo. Federation of European Simulation Societies, pp.118-123.

[3] B. Eilam (2012). System thinking and feeding relations: Learning with a live ecosystem model. Instructional Science, 40(2), 213-239.

[4] O. Ben-Zvi Assaraf and N. Orion (2010). “Four case studies, six years latter: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1253-1280.

[5] C. J. Boulter and B. C. Buckley (2000). “Constructing a typology of models for Science education”. In J. K., Gilbert and J. C. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.46-47.

[6] B. Brehmer (1992). “Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems”. Acta Psychologica, vol. 81, pp. 211-241.

[7] B. C. Bucklet, J. D. Gobert, A. C. H. Kindfield, P. Horwitz, R. F. Tinker, B. Gerlits, U. Wilensky, C. Dede and J. Willet (2004). “Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogicaTM: What do they learn? How do they learn? What do we know”? Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 13 no.1, pp. 23-41.

[8] E. S. Charles, & S. d'Apollonia (2004). “Developing a conceptual framework to explain emergent causality: Overcoming ontological beliefs to achieve conceptual change”. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner and T. Reiger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual cognitive science society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[9] M. T. H. Chi (2005). “Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust”. The Journal of the learning sciences, vol. 14 no. 2, pp. 161-199.

[10] F. Draper (1993). “A proposed sequence for developing system thinking in a grades' 4-12 curriculum”. System Dynamic Review, vol. 9, pp. 207-214.

[11] J. W. Forrester (1992). “Policies and information sources for modeling”. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59 no. 1, pp. 42-63.

[12] J. B. Garfield and D. Ben-Zvi (2008). “Research on teaching and learning statistics”. In J. B. Garfield and D.Ben-Zvi (Eds.), Developing students' statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer Science + Business Media B.V., pp. 21-43.

[13] R. N. Giere (1999). “Using models to represent reality”. In: L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model based reasoning in scientific discovery. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers., pp. 40-57.

[14] J. K. Gilbert and R. Justi (2016). Modelling-based teaching in science education. Springer.

[15] R. Golan Duncan and B. J. Reiser (2007). “Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understandings of molecular genetics”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 938-959.

[16] R. L. Goldstone (2006). “The complex systems see change in education”. Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 35-43.

[17] R. L. Goldstone and Y. Sakamoto (2003). “The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems”. Cognitive Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 414-466.

[18] R. Goldstone and J. Y. Son (2005). “The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations”. Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 14, pp. 69-110.

[19] M. E. Hinton and M. B. Nakhleh (1999). “Students' microscopic, macroscopic, and symbolic representations of chemical reactions”. The Chemical Educator, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1-29.

[20] C. E. Hmelo-Silver (2004). “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn”? Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, pp. 235-266.

[21] C. E. Hmelo-Silver, D. L. Holton and J. L. Kolodner (2000). “Designing learning about complex systems”. Journal of the Learning Science, vol. 9, pp. 247-298.

[22] M. J. Jacobson (2001). “Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices”. Complexity, vol. 6, no.3, pp. 41-49.

[23] M. J. Jacobson and U. Wilensky (2006). “Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences”. Journal of the Learning Sciences,vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11-34.

[24] M. J. Jacobson, M. Kapur and P. Reimann (2014). “Toward a complex systems meta-theory of learning as an emergent phenomenon: Beyond the cognitive versus situative debate”. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O'Connor, T. Lee and L. D’Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014, Volume 1. International Society of the Learning Sciences., pp. 362-369.

[25] M. J. Jacobson, M. Kapur, H-J. So and J. Lee (2011). “The ontologies of complexity and learning about complex systems”. Instructional Science, vol. 39, pp. 763-783.

[26] S. Kauffman (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press.

[27] F. Landriscina (2013). Simulation and learning. A model-centered approach. Springer.

[28] T. S. Levy and U. Wilensky (2008). “Inventing a “mid-level” to make ends meet: Reasoning between the levels of complexity”. Cognition and Instruction, vol. 26, pp. 1-47.

[29] R. Lowe, W. Schnotz and T. Rasch (2011). “Aligning affordances of graphs with learning task requirements”. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 452-459.

[30] E. B. Mandinach (1989). “Model-building and the use of computer simulation of dynamic systems”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 5, pp. 221-243.

[31] E. Moxnes (2000). “Not only the tragedy of the commons: Misperceptions of feedback and policies for sustainable development”. System Dynamics Review, vol. 16 no. 4, pp. 325-348.

[32] N. J. Nersessian (1999). “Model based reasoning in conceptual change”. In L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model based reasoning in scientific discovery. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 5-22.

[33] E. Norling (2007). “Contrasting a system dynamics model and an agent-based model of food web evolution”. In L. Autunes and K. Takadama (Eds.), LNAI 4442. Springer-Verlag, pp. 57-68.

[34] J. Ossimitz (1997). “The development of systems thinking skills using system dynamics modeling tools.” Available: http://wwwu.uni klu.ac.at/gossimit/sdyn/gdm_eng.htm.

[35] H. V-D. Parunak, R. Savit and R. L. Riolo (1998). “Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: A case study and users' guide”. In J. S. Sichman, R. Conte and N. Gilbert (Eds.), Multi-Agent Systems and AgentBased Simulations. Springer-Verlag, pp. 10-25.

[36] S. K. Reed (2010).Thinking visually. Psychology Press. Taylor & Francis Group.

[37] M. Resnick and U. Wilensky (1998). “Diving into complexity: Developing problematic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities”. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 153-172.

[38] Y. Rogers and M. Scaife (1998). “How can interactive multimedia facilitate learning”? In J. Lee (Ed.), Intelligence and multimodality in multimedia interface: Research and applications. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Press, pp. 34.

[39] R. J. Spiro, J. C. Jehng (1990). “Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for non-linear and multi-dimensional traversal of complex subject-matter”. In D. Nix and R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multi-media: Exploring ideas in high technology. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 163-205.

[40] M. Steiff and U. Wilensky (2003). “Connected chemistry: incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 12,pp. 285-302.

[41] M. Steiff, M. Hegarty and G. Deslongchamps (2011). “Identifying representational competence with multirepresentational displays.” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 29, no, 1, pp. 123-145.

[42] J. D. Sterman (2000). Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGrawHill.

[43] K. Thompson and P. Reinmann (2010). “Pattern of use of an agent-based model and a system dynamics model: The application of patterns of use and the impacts on learning outcomes”. Computer & Education, vol. 54, pp. 392-403.

[44] T. Vachliotis, K. Salta and C. Tzougraki (2014). “Meaningful understanding and system thinking in organic chemistry: Validating measurement and exploring relationships”. Research in Science Education, vol. 44, pp. 239-266.

[45] J. J. G. Van Merrienboer, P. A. Kirschner and L. Kester (2003). “Taking the load off a learner's mind: instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist. 38 (1), 5-13.

[46] Verhoeff, R. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2008). Systems modeling and the development of coherent understanding of cell biology”. International Journal of Science Education, vol. 30, pp. 543-568.

[47] U. Wilensky and K. Reisman (2006). “Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories - An embodied modeling approach”. Cognition and Instruction, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 171-209.

[48] U. Wilensky and M. Resnick (1999). “Thinking in levels: A dynamics systems approach to making sense of the world”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp, 3-19.

[49] U. Wilensky and W. Stroup (2002). “Participatory simulations: Envisioning the networked classroom as a way to support systems learning for all”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.