Journal of Advances in Education Research
Action Research to Integrate Science with Mathematics through Garden-Based Learning at the Elementary School Level
Download PDF (840.2 KB) PP. 199 - 211 Pub. Date: November 9, 2017
Author(s)
- Sarah Rummel
North Elementary School, Morgantown, United States - James Rye*
Department of Curriculum & Instruction/Literacy Studies, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States - Sarah Selmer
Department of Curriculum & Instruction/Literacy Studies, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States - Melissa Luna
Department of Curriculum & Instruction/Literacy Studies, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States
Abstract
Keywords
References
[1] Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (2016), BSCS 5E Instructional Model, Available: http://www.bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model.
[2] D. Blair (2009), “The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening,” The journal of environmental education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 15–38.
[3] Council of Chief State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2010), Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, Available: http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.
[4] J. Eichinger (2004), Activities for integrating science and mathematics. Pearson.
[5] J. Fraenkel, N. Wallen, and H. Hyun (2015), How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
[6] C. Franklin, G. Kader, D. Mewborn, J. Moreno, R. Peck, M. Perry, and P. Scheaffer (2007), Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) Report: A pre-K–12 curriculum framework. American Statistical Association, Available: http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GAISEPreK-12_Full.pdf.
[7] R. Louve (2005), Last child in the woods. Algonquin.
[8] J. Major (2006), “Will it float?” Science scope, vol. 30, no.2, pp. 22-24.
[9] E. Muehlhoff and E. Boutrif (2010). A new deal for school gardens. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Available: http:// http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1689e/i1689e00.pdf.
[10] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014), Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Executive Summary. Available: http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/ PtAExecutiveSummary.pdf.
[11] Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States (2013), Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. National Academies Press. Available: http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
[12] J. Rye (1997), “Grape expectations.” The science teacher, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 41-46.
[13] J. Rye, N. O’Hara-Tomkins, R. Eck, and W. Neal (2008), “Promoting Youth Physical Activity and Healthy Weight Through Schools.” West Virginia medical journal, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 12-15.
[14] S. Selmer, J. Rye, E. Malone, K. Trebino, and D. Fernandez (2014), “What shall we grow in our school garden to sell at the farmers market: Initiating statistical literacy through science and mathematics integration.” Science activities, vol. 51, pp. 17-32. DOI: 10.1080/00368121.2013.860418.
[15] H. Stone and J. Rye (2017), “A Fruity Investigation: Data and Measurement,” Presentation at the NCTM 2017 Annual Meeting and Exposition, San Antonio.
[16] N. Wells, B. Myers, L. Todd, K. Barale, B. Gaoloach, G. Ferenz…Aitken, M (2015), “The effects of school gardens on children’s science knowledge: A randomized controlled trial of low-income elementary schools,” International journal of science education, vol. 37, no. 17, pp. 2858-2878.
[17] R. White and R. Gunstone (1992), Probing understanding. Falmer Press.
[18] D. Williams and P.S. Dixon (2013), “Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in schools: Synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010,” Review of educational research, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 211-235.