Isaac Scientific Publishing

Frontiers in Management Research

Emergence of the International Threat of Space Weaponization and Militarization: Harmonizing International Community for Safety and Security of Space

Download PDF (404.4 KB) PP. 100 - 114 Pub. Date: July 1, 2019

DOI: 10.22606/fmr.2019.33003

Author(s)

  • Abbas Sheer
    School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT), Beijing, 100081 China
  • Li Shouping*
    School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT), Beijing, 100081 China

Abstract

Space Weaponization and Militarization is a mounting legal issue to the world peace. Selfprotective in its first epochs, the practice of space for military drives has now become aggressive. The notion of militarized space has been changed by that of “weaponized” outer space. The international law in space only stringently forbids placing munitions of mass destruction into orbit. So it is imperative to make such stringent laws, which could easily prevent occurrence of conflicts and tension amongst subjects involving outer space and halt this growing threat of world weaponization. Different nations are trying to put weapons into space and are trying to destroy the beauty of space. The evolution in military possessions in the outer space, Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, Antimissile Laser Weapons (AMW), antisatellite weapons, surveillance, and intelligence capabilities is a question mark for international community. This article provides a detailed overview of the emerging technologies will have serious implications. This paper focuses on the International community to realize the stringent international legislation to prevent the emerging apprehension regarding space weaponization and highlights defect in national and international legislation. The legislative authorities other than United Nations organizations are appropriate for some attendant concerns about military utilization, orbital debris, environmental protection and impact on space tourism have not been covered completely by treaties. It is intended that establishing a uniformity legislative assembly and space court with the enforcement competency at international level to settle disputes of international responsibilities. Thus, this paper suggests international cooperation development on space demilitarization and protection of citizenry of countries regardless the process of using local remedies at the national level. All this process makes more attention to ensure the protection and reassurance of the outer space in the large interest of humanity.

Keywords

Space weaponization and militarization, sustainability of space, national and international legislation.

References

[1] Cheng, B. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty: Thirtieth Anniversary, (1998),156.

[2] Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, signed in Geneva May 18, 1977.

[3] Convention on International Civil Aviation, Chicago, 1944.

[4] Convention on the Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, entered into force September 15, 1976.

[5] E. Korovin, La Conquéte de la Stratosphere et le Droit International, (Rev. Gen. de Droit Int.,1934) ,41.

[6] General Assembly Resolution, Question of General and Complete Disarmament, UN GAOR, Res/1884 (XVIII), (1963).

[7] H. York, Nuclear Deterrence and the Military Uses of Space, (F. Long, D. Hafner and J. Boutwell, eds., Weapons and Space, 1999), 17.

[8] Henry L. S. “Is the Weaponization of Space Inevitable”?

[9] Jasentuliyana, N. International Space Law and the United Nations, (Kluwer Law International: Hague, 1999), 104.

[10] Jessup, Cf. P.C. The Reality of International Law, (1940), 18.

[11] Karen, E. “United States public delegate to the 63rd session UNGA. delivered in the debate on outer space (disarmament aspects) of the general assembly’s first committee” in: Arms Control Update, U.S. Delegation to the Conference on Disarmament, Geneva, October 20, 2008

[12] Ley, W. “Rockets, Men and Missiles in Space” (New York: Signet, 1969), 77.

[13] Larsen, P.B. Issues Relating to the Civilian and Military Uses of GNSS, (2001), 17.

[14] Michael Sirak, Air force leadership: Chinese ASAT marked turning point: space No longer sanctuary, Defense Dail. (February 12, 2007).

[15] Michael O’ Hanlon, Technology Change and the Future Warfare, Manas Publications, New Delhi, 2005, p. 1.

[16] Michael O’ Hanlon, UNCOPUOS 59th session Vienna, 8-17 June 2016, Report of the LSC 55th session, held in Vienna from 4-15 April 2016.

[17] Melzer, N. “Human rights implications of the usage of drones and unmanned robots in warfare”. Brussels: European Parliament, 2013.

[18] Michael Sirak, Air force leadership: Chinese ASAT marked turning point: space No longer sanctuary, Defense Dail. (February 12, 2007).

[19] Nogrady, B. The Real Risks of Artificial Intelligence. 10 November 2016,

[20] Podvig, P. Russian Military Space Capabilities, (2002), 24.

[21] Robert A. R. “Armed Conflict on the Final Frontier: The Law of War in Space” (2000), 554.

[22] Sandra E. Defense official: Trump is serious about creating a space force, Space News (15 March, 2018).

[23] Samson, V. CDI Analysis: Shooting Down USA 193, World Security Institute, February 27, 2008.

[24] Smith, R.A., Correspondence: Man and his Mark, (Paris: Presses Universities de France, 1949) ,55.

[25] The Outer Space Treaty, was opened for signature at Washington, London, and Moscow on January 27, 1967, and the Treaty entered into force on October 10, 1967.

[26] Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, signed at Moscow August 5, 1963.

[27] The Outer Space Treaty, was opened for signature at Washington, London, and Moscow on January 27, 1967, and the Treaty entered into force on October 10, 1967.

[28] Technology Change and the Future Warfare, Manas Publications, New Delhi, 2005, p. 1.

[29] Tegmark, M. Benefits & Risks of Artificial Intelligence. 2016, https://futureoflife.org/background/benefits-risks -of-artificial-intelligence.

[30] U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Feb. 13, 2006, Quoting National Military Strategy to Combat Weapons.

[31] UNCOPUOS 59th session Vienna, 8-17 June 2016, Report of the LSC 55th session, held in Vienna from 4-15 April 2016.

[32] Woods, M. “Satellites Provide Vital Reconnaissance, Communications to War Effort” (University of Cologne press, 2005), 44.

[33] Wolf, J. “US Eyes Space as Possible Battleground” (Paris: Presses Universities de France, 2005), 47.

[34] Weeden, Brian. 2007 Chinese Anti-Satellite Test Fact Sheet,” Secure World Foundation.